DropBox) into a flexible bidirectional synchronization tool. Yeah, I know there are a bunch of other tools that can do this, so no biggie, but it was nice to have as an option.Īt the same time, Cloud Station has evolved from a simple “magic folder” (e.g. Strangely, my old copy job survived the upgrade and continued to run, but there is no way to create a new job like that. No grabbing that external drive and plugging it into another system. Versioning is better in most ways, but it does require going through DSM to get at the data. USB drives) but loses the ability to do a simple differential backup to USB, which is what I had been doing. Hyper Backup allows multi-version, database-driven backups to both volumes AND mount points (e.g. With DSM 6.0, the old Backup & Replication is gone, replaced by Hyper Backup. Tracking deleted files is also very similar to turning on the recycle bin for a shared folder. The new Cloud Station Backup client utility adds to the confusion about what and how you backup files. The inclusion of versioning in Cloud Station strikes me as problematic because 1) versioning is completely unrelated to file synch and 2) it does something very similar to Hyper Backup. I would love to hear what others think, if my conclusions are correct, and what you find as the best use-cases for each. There seems to be a lot of confusion and overlap between the two. I've had a couple of days to play with the new DSM 6.0 and especially the changes to Cloud Station and Hyper Backup.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |